Re: Why spam is a problem.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 03:19:34PM -0400, stanislav shalunov wrote:
> > P.S. If people complained more to the ISPs it would help.
> > http://www.internet2.edu/~shalunov/uce/reporting-spam.html
> 
> This is a myth.  Reporting to ISP's can't possibly help, since so many
> spammers use (as you yourself point out in your web page) throwaway
> $20 accounts.  By the time you complain, and the ISP closes the
> account, the spammer has moved on to some other account.

I didn't claim that complaining about spam solves the problem.
Clearly it doesn't -- spam gets reported today and we all still get
spam.  It does help: it helps cut off ways for the spammers to benefit
from spam (this only works against spammers that have something to
sell directly, but they send a sizable franction of all spam) on one
hand and it encourages ISPs to make it harder to spam from their
networks (like charging a clean-up fee) on the other hand.

In addition, processing spam complaints is a cost.  It is a cost to be
born by those who willingly or unwillingly abet the spammer.  It helps
shift the economic balance -- if only to a small extent.

If no-one ever complained about spam, the problem would be worse than
it is today.

-- 
Stanislav Shalunov		http://www.internet2.edu/~shalunov/

Religion is the opium of them asses.		--Karlm Arx


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]