Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Robert Cannon <rcannon101@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1))
From: Scott Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:14:46 -0400
Cc: ietf@IETF.ORG
In-reply-to: <20020812175947.89488.qmail@web14808.mail.yahoo.com>
Sender: owner-ietf@IETF.ORG

When were the problems with "Internet" meaning the bisynch ATM network
cleaned up?  How many of the definitions cited were in reaction to that
case?

References:
- Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1))
  - From: John Morris
- Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1))
  - From: Robert Cannon

Prev by Date: Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1))
Next by Date: RE: RFC Nos.
Previous by thread: Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1))
Next by thread: Re: US Communication Act (47 USC 230 (f)(1))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]