Russ Allbery <rra@Stanford.EDU> writes: > However, ICANN has now been found to be engaging in illegal activity to > obstruct the ability of an independent director to perform his oversight > responsibilities. This has been established in a court of law. Someone has correctly pointed out to me that the activities were found to be improper rather than illegal, or in other words civil rather than criminal. While this doesn't change my opinion, that's a valid point, and my language was sloppy. My apologies. -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>