RE: ECN and ISOC: request for help...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 01:16 AM 7/24/2002, Franck Martin wrote:
>I'm not in a campaign to promote ECN, or anything... I'm saying that ISOC
>web site is not reachable if you enable ECN, which RFC793(standard) or
>RFC3168(proposed Standard) talk about.
>
>I don't want to talk about what is a standard or what is not... What is
>compliant or not...
>
>Will there be anybody to volunteer and fix the routers leading to ISOC web
>site, mailing lists, e-mail addresses and so on?

RFC3168 is dated September 2001. That's pretty recent. It is likely many 
routers have not even been rebooted since then, let alone been updated to 
new software revisions. Assuming a new software revision is available that 
supports ECN, that new revision would have to be tested and qualified 
before being deployed. Sites which insist on ECN will be disappointed for a 
long time to come.

That said, such routers really shouldn't choke on the packets. I would 
guess it's dropping the packets due to explicit configuration, though.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Senie                                        dts@senie.com
Amaranth Networks Inc.                    http://www.amaranth.com


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]