At 01:16 AM 7/24/2002, Franck Martin wrote: >I'm not in a campaign to promote ECN, or anything... I'm saying that ISOC >web site is not reachable if you enable ECN, which RFC793(standard) or >RFC3168(proposed Standard) talk about. > >I don't want to talk about what is a standard or what is not... What is >compliant or not... > >Will there be anybody to volunteer and fix the routers leading to ISOC web >site, mailing lists, e-mail addresses and so on? RFC3168 is dated September 2001. That's pretty recent. It is likely many routers have not even been rebooted since then, let alone been updated to new software revisions. Assuming a new software revision is available that supports ECN, that new revision would have to be tested and qualified before being deployed. Sites which insist on ECN will be disappointed for a long time to come. That said, such routers really shouldn't choke on the packets. I would guess it's dropping the packets due to explicit configuration, though. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Senie dts@senie.com Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranth.com