Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> we don't make ethernet standards, ieee does.  we don't make sdh
>> standards, itu does.  etc. etc.  in this case, i would be careful
>> not to encroach on w3's toes.
> What would Jabber have to do with the W3C? It's a protocol, not a 
> document format.  Furthermore, we already have two efforts in this 
> space; if the W3C were likely to object, they would've by now.

i do not know how much clearer i could be than

>> i have no idea if this is an issue here, as i am not in contact
>> with w3c or whomever else.  i expect you, pete, etc. will know
>> far better than i if we are nearing hot water here.  i am just
>> asking you to please be conscious of the issue.

randy


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]