More generally, see <http://www.normos.org/ietf/rfc/rfc2026.txt> to understand the standards process. - dan -- Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@dankohn.com> <http://www.dankohn.com/> <tel:+1-650-327-2600> -----Original Message----- From: Pawlukiewicz Jane [mailto:pawlukiewicz_jane@bah.com] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 06:36 To: Dan Kohn Cc: ietf Subject: Re: which standard? Hi Dan, Thanks for clearing that up. I did see in RFC 2965 that it states it obsoletes 2109, however I was confused as RFC 2965 is listed as a _proposed_ standard. Thanks to you now I know RFC 2965 is currently in effect. Thanks, Jane Dan Kohn wrote: > > <http://www.normos.org/en/summaries/ietf/rfc/rfc2109.html> shows that > RFC 2109 is obsoleted by RFC 2965. RFC 2965 also mentions this in the > third line of the document. > > The canonical source of information on what obsoletes and is updated by > what is the RFC Editor's website: > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index2.html> > > - dan > -- > Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@dankohn.com> > <http://www.dankohn.com/> <tel:+1-650-327-2600> > Essays announced on <mailto:dankohn-subscribe@yahoogroups.com> > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pawlukiewicz Jane [mailto:pawlukiewicz_jane@bah.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:44 > To: ietf > Subject: which standard? > > Hi, > > I'm interested in reading up on cookies. Is RFC 2109 or RFC 2965 > currently in effect? > > Thanks for any help, > > Jane > > - > This message was passed through ietf_censored@carmen.ipv6.cselt.it, > which > is a sublist of ietf@ietf.org. Not all messages are passed. > Decisions on what to pass are made solely by Raffaele D'Albenzio.