Ned "sed": > ...fax is dead technology, who cares??? FAX is NOT dead at NASA. We send a LOT of documents to other centers that cannot be sent via e-mail (photocopies of shipping documents, flight manifests, older engineering drawings, etc [things that are not available electronically]). That is why I am so interested in seeing this work completed. I just don't comment much because I don't have anything to say. I am learning this stuff as I go, and not very well [datacomm is not my strongest subject :) - I do video for Shuttle & Space Station, but I recognize a money saver when I see it] My main interest is that it will save NASA (therefore the taxpayers) LOTS of dollars in long distance charges. I would estimate around a million a year, but I have no data to back that up. I will try to get some data if anyone wants to see it (write me privately - if I get enough requests, I will post it, else I will send it privately). So, remember, while you are working on this, you are preparing the way for TAX savings (it's YOUR money). Does that encourage you to continue? And if you REALLY think that fax is dead, why are you working so hard to finish it?? (I know, because the IESG/IMC/etc says to...) Regards to all & a special "howdy" to Dan Wing/RJC Richard Coles Lockheed Martin, in support of NASA/Johnson Space Center/Houston rcoles@ems.jsc.nasa.gov (or as shown above) -----Original Message----- From: ned.freed@mrochek.com [mailto:ned.freed@mrochek.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 1:43 AM To: Robert Elz Cc: Dave Crocker; Keith Moore; ned.freed@mrochek.com; John C Klensin; Alexey Melnikov; ietf@ietf.org; ietf-fax@imc.org Subject: Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation toProposed Standard > First, let me say that I haven't read the draft, and don't intend to. > So, if you want to ignore my comments (questions really) feel free. Fascinating. Although your detailed understanding of how this works is fairly far off the mark, you nevertheless have suggested a viable approach that I, at least, hadn't considered. > But from what I have picked up from the (smallish) number of messages > from an even smaller set of people (no great surprise, fax is dead > technology, who cares???) on the ietf list in the past day or so, I > surmise that this protocol work something like the following. < balance of text deleted for Net economy >
