At 05:20 PM 7/2/2002 -0700, ned.freed@mrochek.com wrote: >I think the determining factor needs to be how clients will actually handle >recipients with differing capabilities. If the least common denominator is >going to be the dominant approach (and I suspect that it will be) no surprise that I agree. However... > If, on the other >hand, messages tailored for a each recipient is going to be the norm, then >VRFY is the correct approach. If the sender is concerned about optimizing for each recipient, they can get that effect by reducing to a single RCPT-TO per DATA. So it is not as pretty as the separate command, but it permits roughly the same mode of operation. d/ ---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850