--On 16. mars 2002 02:21 +0000 "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> wrote: > There certainly isn't IDN WG consensus on IDNA as the long-term IDN > solution. In fact, many of us suspect that there's consensus on the > following statement, which implies that IDNA is merely temporary: > > The long-term IDN solution will encode Unicode characters as UTF-8 on > the wire. > If this was reformulated as The long-term IDN solution will not use DNS it would have my vote.