On 19 May 2011, at 12:54, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > On Wed, 18 May 2011 07:24:19 +0100, Colin Perkins <csp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> It might be that the API makes the problem go away, but that seems like a risky bet in the absence of any sketch of an API (it would not need to be normative). > >> Do you want to propose an API? > > I have no _sane_ ideas how to build an API that works with the current proposal, that's why I'm concerned. What do you need other than one new socket option to indicate that UDP encapsulation is to be used and to provide the port? I must be missing something, since the API doesn't seem difficult. -- Colin Perkins http://csperkins.org/
