Re: AD review: draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-rtt-option-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



constructive: when, or *at least* after developing a protocol, think about deployment: why would people use it, how can we get them to use it, how can we make it easier for the protocol to pass through middle- boxes etc?

destructive: when the perhaps most important work is done - thinking about actual deployment - call it a futile effort already.

i wonder, what's the point of being destructive?

michael


On Mar 5, 2011, at 10:29 AM, <L.Wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <L.Wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 5 Mar 2011, at 06:35, Lars Eggert wrote:

On 2011-3-4, at 22:25, L.Wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Please file a bug on that grammar checker.

Feel free: http://www.languagetool.org/

Done.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3200352&group_id=110216&atid=655717

Can we please focus on the technical discussion and not at grammar nit fixing?

of DCCP? What's the point?

Lloyd Wood
L.Wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux DCCP]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [DDR & Rambus]

  Powered by Linux