Hi Lars, I'm planning on submitting a WG version of dccp-natencap sometime in the next few days. I was planning for this version to incorporate changes based on the comments we had back in December -- so from my viewpoint there would be no open issues at that time. Of course new issues could come up... Tom P. > -----Original Message----- > From: dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Lars Eggert > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:22 AM > To: Pasi Sarolahti > Cc: DCCP working group > Subject: Re: Next steps on UDP encapsulation > > Hi, > > On 2009-12-24, at 2:29, Pasi Sarolahti wrote: > > After further discussing with people during the past couple of weeks, > > and in the interest of making progress on this topic, we are planning > > to proceed with adopting draft-phelan-dccp-natencap as a DCCP working > > group draft. > > could I suggest that Tom resubmit an update of draft-phelan-dccp-natencap > as a WG draft, and post a list of open issues? > > (That way, we can decide if the WG should meet at IETF-77 or not.) > > Lars
