Tom -
What is the relationship of this update to CCID 3? Should CCID 3
implementations follow this instead of RFC 3448? I thought that was
the
intent but RFC 4342 (CCID 3) says CCID 3 implementations MAY track
changes to the throughput equation, but SHOULD wait for explicit
updates
to CCID 3 for other changes...
It is definitely the intent that CCID3 implementations follow rfc3448bis
instead of RFC 3448 (if rfc3448bis is approved).
RFC3448bis obsoletes RFC 3448 (if approved).
As part of the AD feedback from Lars, I just added:
Obsoletes: 3448 (if approved)
to the header of draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-06a.txt.
Can we just add:
Updates: 3448 (if approved)
to the header also?
Or do we need more language than that, do you think?
(Good catch...)
- Sally
http://www.icir.org/floyd/
