I prefer "data-limited"; any data comes ultimately from an application.
Eddie
Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
Sally Floyd wrote:
Dear Sally,
Just to avoid ambiguity, in 3448-bis, would it be better to change
data-limited to application-limited? This would conforms to RFC2861.
On looking over RFC 2861 *very* briefly, I can't tell if it uses the
term "application-limited"
to include idle periods or not. Ah well...
- Sally
http://www.icir.org/floyd/
Interesting discussion - I'd have chosen "application-limited", since I
consider it an application/codec design choice, and as we experience
more advanced media codecs I would expect more "decisions" in the sender
to influence what we see on the wire (even for streaming media).
- Others may prefer different terms?
Gorry
