Hi I can only comment on the CCID-4 draft and I support that it becomes a working group item esp. as it has potential to becoem useful for VoIP. In a previous email to this group I gave an elaborate explanation of the properties of modern speech/audio codecs and possibly I can contribute with text in this direction and how CCID-4 can address these issues as good as possible. Is there any chance that the faster restart work becomes a part of CCID-4 ?, asking because I believe the combination of the two might become useful. Regards Ingemar > -----Original Message----- > From: Gorry Fairhurst [mailto:gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: den 8 september 2007 19:28 > To: dccp@xxxxxxxx > Cc: gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Interest in WG adopting the I-Ds on > ccid3-drops & ccid-4? > > > The following 2 Internet Drafts were presented at the last > IETF, and we agreed that after this meeting to ask the IETF > dccp WG whether they would agree to adopting these as > official work items: > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dccp/draft-kohler-dccp-ccid3-drops-01.txt EXP > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dccp/ draft-floyd-dccp-ccid4-01.txt PS > > Documents accepted by the WG are intended to be finally > published as Standards-track RFC, according to the Charter > milestone in: > http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/dccp-charter.html > > At this time, we are asking working group members and > interested parties to send comments/queries/objections to > either the dccp WG mailing list > (above) or to me as a WG Chair (gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx). > Comments on this topic received before 21st September 2007 > would be helpful in making this decision. > > In particular we are seeking feedback on any of: > > * Have you read the current drafts? > * Is this work useful to you or your organisation? > * Do you have ideas/text/comments that you would like to contribute? > * Is this work ready for progression by this WG? > > Please *do* reply if you would like to see this work proceed. > > Best wishes, > > Gorry Fairhurst & Tom Phelan > (DCCP WG Co-Chair) > > >
