On 8/1/07, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Simulations are needed, and three of the issues I'd like to understand are: > 1) What is the best time-constant used for decay of the max receive rate > allowed by FR? I think the case for the periods used in the draft to > maintain the window are not justified - either by need to cater for 30 > minutes of idleness, nor the safety of this case. In my mind, this is > an issue that should be thought upon, since the longer the value the > more the "case" that this should be experimental. In my mind, I wonder > if much smaller periods would be acceptable for typical applications - > such as video-conference sessions (e.g. by thinking on different periods > of idleness)? I noticed this as well. 30 minutes of idleness is a long time. In my opinion 3 minutes would be plenty for most applications! Ian -- Web1: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/ Web2: http://www.jandi.co.nz Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz
