On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 09:50:37PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 4/15/24 9:40 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:48:10PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote: > >> > >> I have a stronger preference to keep the KEY_DOUBLECLICK - that one seems less controversial as a genuine new input event. > > > > Please see my response to Peter's letter. I think it very much depends > > on how it will be used (associated with the pointer or standalone as it > > is now). > > > > For standalone application, recalling your statement that on Win you > > have this gesture invoke configuration utility I would argue for > > KEY_CONFIG for it. > > KEY_CONFIG is already generated by Fn + F# on some ThinkPads to launch > the GNOME/KDE control center/panel and I believe that at least GNOME > comes with a default binding to map KEY_CONFIG to the control-center. Not KEY_CONTROLPANEL? Are there devices that use both Fn+# and the doubleclick? Would it be an acceptable behavior for the users to have them behave the same? Thanks. -- Dmitry _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
