Hi, On 4/15/24 9:40 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:48:10PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote: >> >> I have a stronger preference to keep the KEY_DOUBLECLICK - that one seems less controversial as a genuine new input event. > > Please see my response to Peter's letter. I think it very much depends > on how it will be used (associated with the pointer or standalone as it > is now). > > For standalone application, recalling your statement that on Win you > have this gesture invoke configuration utility I would argue for > KEY_CONFIG for it. KEY_CONFIG is already generated by Fn + F# on some ThinkPads to launch the GNOME/KDE control center/panel and I believe that at least GNOME comes with a default binding to map KEY_CONFIG to the control-center. So IMHO re-using KEY_CONFIG for the doubletap trackpoint thing is not a good idea. But as mentioned elsewhere in the thread everyone seems to be ok with using KEY_VENDOR for this ? Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
