On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:00 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 7/9/20 8:02 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 4:24 AM Mark Pearson <markpearson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Newer Lenovo Thinkpad platforms have support to identify whether the > >> system is on-lap or not using an ACPI DYTC event from the firmware. > >> > >> This patch provides the ability to retrieve the current mode via sysfs > >> entrypoints and will be used by userspace for thermal mode and WWAN > >> functionality > > > > Hans, do you think it's good to have custom ABI for this? I think you > > may be know better what types of ABI we already have for such thing. > > Actually, Mark asked me the same question before submitting his > patch upstream. I'm never a fan of custom ABI for this. But for now > the solution Lenovo has chosen to deal with thermal management > issues on modern hw is unique to Lenovo and we do not have anything > like this anywhere else. > > So for now I believe that a custom ABI is best. > > If we see this becoming a common feature on more platforms then we can > design a generic API for it once we have a better idea how this would > look like when implemented by others and then thinkpad_acpi can easily > add support for the new generic interface, while keeping its own > custom interface for backward compatibility. Thank you very much for the elaborative comment, appreciated! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
