On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Ognjen Galić <smclt30p@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> You definitely need to send a new revision with all comments >> addressed. So far you didn't responce to them which I recognize as >> total agreement that they have to be addressed. > > I asked for not sending new versions before I have a chance to look at > the current one in detail, but enough time has passed after the last > one, so I agree. Sending a new version at this point won't hurt. :-) Thanks, Rafael, for clarification, that's exactly what I kept in mind when proposing a new version (I'm concerned as well of frequency of patch series to be not so high). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
