On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 22:11 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Please review, and make sure I'm on the right lines. I also can't > see > > the input patches in the ibm-acpi-2.6 tree, so I've done this > against > > linus. This isn't for merging, it's just a preview for comments. > Why is defining a _new_ device with its own mixer a good idea? Isn't > it actually supposed to be a track in the builtin ALSA device instead? > And then we'd get feedback from that one... It is a _physically_ separate mixer - i.e. independent from the built-in ALSA device. It's just unusual hardware. Also IMO it would be impossible to link the nvram polling with another master volume on the main mixer in the thinkpad_acpi code. Richard. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
