On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Shem Multinymous wrote: > >More like it is a "make sure we can actually eject, as we have been told > >to". We might return an error instead, but if we do, we need a way to > >force-eject (e.g. echo 2 >eject). > > Which stage are you referring to? Stage 2, of course. It is useful to have a force_eject functionality that **will** eject and not error out because of anything other than the eject command itself failing. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
