On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Shem Multinymous wrote: > Userspace wants to (non-force-)-unmount by itself after (1), so it can > stop the eject process if the filesystems cannot be cleanly > unmounted. So the force-unmount at (3) ends up being a redundant > safety measure at best. More like it is a "make sure we can actually eject, as we have been told to". We might return an error instead, but if we do, we need a way to force-eject (e.g. echo 2 >eject). -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
