On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Alex Deucher wrote: > On 3/13/07, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > I vote for "thinkpad_*", since "tp_" seems too ambiguous. Iis there > > > > any concrete collision? > > > > > > I prefer thinkpad_* as well. > > > > Ok, what about thinkpad-laptop/thinkpad_laptop ? > > seems a bit redundant, but still better than tp. It is, as thinkpad implies laptop. We will probably also have snd_thinkpad, for the ALSA module (if I make it into its own module, which is probably a very good idea). I'd jump in and get thinkpad_acpi for most of the stuff in ibm-acpi, but the problem is that there used to exist an thinkpad-acpi module, by Erik Rigtorp. It never made it to mainline (I just checked, it is not in 2.6.9, and ibm-acpi was added in 2.6.10 and completely superseeded Erik's module which only did hotkeys). I guess I can retake the name without too much problems after so long and since it never made it to mainline AND it was not widely used, but still... What do you guys think? -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel