On 3/13/07, Shem Multinymous <multinymous@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 3/13/07, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It would be nice to have > > ALSA stuff in a separate module, for example. > > Some distributions have modprobe-based mechanisms for loading ALSA > drivers. They might react unfavorably to ALSA drivers loaded by other > means. > > > > For the name, I think I favour "tp_*", so we'd have tp_acpi (most of what is > > ibm-acpi today), etc. It is not as descriptive as I'd like, but thinkpad_* > > is already taken by out-of-tree stuff. > > I vote for "thinkpad_*", since "tp_" seems too ambiguous. Iis there > any concrete collision? I prefer thinkpad_* as well. Alex > > FWIW, I'm awaiting an opportunity to rename tp_smapi to > thinkpad_smapi; and thinkpad_ec is already OK. > > Shem ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
