Re: [lm-sensors] RFC: conversion of ibm-acpi to hwmon sysfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:38:36 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Ok, I have fan*_* and temp*_input hanging directly from the device (no
> groups).  However, that device has a lot of other stuff that is not even
> remotely accounted for in hwmon, such as control of video outputs and
> hotkeys, the firmware action beeper, etc.
> 
> Does that cause problems for lm-sensors, or would it just ignore the extra
> attributes and groups?

As long as the other file names do not collide with the any of names in
Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface, it's OK. libsensors will ignore
the extra stuff.

> I can provide two devices, ibm-acpi.0 and ibm-acpi.1, and have the hwmon
> attributes in only one of them, and register just that one with the hwmon
> class.  Would that be better/safer?

A single device would be fine. In the long run we will probbaly have to
turn the hwmon attributes into class attributes anyway, so they will
get their own naming space.

-- 
Jean Delvare

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Advice]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux