Bryan Kadzban wrote:
William Hubbs wrote:
I spoke with Kay on irc, and he expressed doubts that it will be
committed.
Not being terribly inclined to set up an IRC client, were there any
issues with the patch itself? Or does he just not like the idea at all
for some reason? (Er, Kay? Maybe I should ask you directly. :-) )
However, I did get another suggestion from one of the guys there.
Automake supports includes, so it would be good to break up
Makefile.am into several modules. That way it would be easy to
include them based on condissionals.
I have started breaking things apart, but if you want, I can send you
the patch as I have it so far and we can collaborate on it. :-)
I'm interested in this too. However, I'm not sure what you are
referring to when you mention modules. Do you mean the automake
instruction 'include'?
The problem with udev as it's currently embedded in systemd is that the
udev programs require several systemd .c utility programs, although they
all build without the problematic libraries required by systemd
(intltool, d-bus, etc). These object files could be combined into each
of the udev programs without problems, but I'm having a problem
understanding the concept of what is acceptable.
AFAICT, there still needs to be a change to configure.ac to optionally
avoid all the extras that systemd needs. That seems to be where to
start, but we need support from upstream to get these changes into the
main distribution.
-- Bruce
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
