On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sure, if there is something we all can use, we will switch over to it. > Until that happens, hacks have to be maintained by the people relying > on them, not by udev upstream. You can use it. Just like many platforms (of varying architectures) already do in other contexts, all using unmodified Linus kernels. Device tree is a well-documented cross-platform way of providing hardware identification information (and in great detail) to the kernel. I think it is the system you are asking for. Am I right in saying that its location in /proc is the main downfall that you are criticising it for? (i.e. would your viewpoint change if it appeared in /sys tomorrow?) Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html