On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 14:04, Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>But on the other hand we require a certain kernel version and it's
>>symbols to work. There should never be a ENOSYS unless something is
>>broken somewhere else.
> It seems that indeed something is broken somewhere else. When I compile
> this small C snippet:
>
> #include <sys/socket.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <errno.h>
>
> int main() {
> ÂÂÂ accept4(0, NULL, 0, 0);
> ÂÂÂ perror("accept4");
> }
>
> then instead of
> "accept4: Socket operation on non-socket"
> I get
> "accept4: Function not implemented".
>
> I'm clueless though why that is since i'm definitely on 2.6.32 and using
> libc6 2.13 which should both be enough for accept4 to be there.
If it show's the return value in strace, it looks like it is the
kernel. Here it does:
accept4(0, 0, NULL, 0) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket)
> thank you for your help so far but it seems this is not a problem with
> udev :)
Yeah, looks weird. Maybe try a more recent kernel first, if the issue goes away.
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
