On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 09:04 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:22:47PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > I consider myself an active member of udev upstream, and I think we've > > taken a wrong turn with the design and implementation. > > What specifically do you mean by this? > > Is the current libudev not a good design for your needs? What should it > be instead? > Actually, quite the opposite! I think that libudev is a great design. I think that the wrong turn is that we rely on a massive "cold plug" phase during boot, and we rely on probing every single piece of hardware during that phase or on later insertion - whether or not anything on the system actually cares about the result. Scott -- Scott James Remnant scott@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
