Due to the lack of documentation on the subject, I have been forced to do my own investigation and make my own conclusions regarding recent changes to the naming of devices on linux. My verdict is that it's the latest example in a chain of spectacularly bad design decisions made by linux developers (Penguins) in the past year or two. Here's why. The purpose of the /dev path is to allow administrators to access devices attached to their systems. Therefore it is sensible for each device handle to expose to the administrator essential facts such as what type of device it is, which controller it is attached to, the position number on that controller and, finally, the identifier of any virtual devices which might benefit from being treated separately. Furthermore the administrator doesn't have the slightest interest in what driver is behind the device, that is irrelevant information that should be hidden. Minix, IIRC did this correctly. Each name has a very easy to understand encoding. The old scheme on Linux did an adequate job of this too. The first two letters indicated what technology it was, the third letter was a mix of controller and position information, and the number indicated the virtual device being referenced. I did an experiment the other day which involved plugging a USB thumb drive into the server. To my horror, the operating system assigned it /dev/sda. The Penguins had gone and *intentionally* designed a namespace collision between all possible storage solutions that might be attached to the computer!!! This is insane. How do I know what drives are which when I go to write an /etc/fstab? If I make any changes to the controllers in the system, designations of existing drives are sure to change. =\ I am aware of /dev/disk so don't flame me about THAT, I have examined it closely and have not found any way to make use of it because it is not possible to reliably predict how a new drive would appear there. On my existing system that is still running an old linux kernel, the device ID of my boot drive is: ata-ST380013A_5JVA01L2 Which is correct... But the device id of my data drive is: scsi-SATA_WDC_WD3200AAKS-_WD-WCAT11129455 Which is wrong because I don't own any SCSI hardware. It should be: SATA-WDC_WD3200AAKS-_WD-WCAT11129455 WTF??? My data drive has two entries in there, the other is: ata-WDC_WD3200AAKS-00B3A0_WD-WCAT11129455 Which is not that inaccurate because SATA is a form of ATA, however it is useful to be able to distinguish the two so you know where your new drive will appear. -- DO NOT USE OBAMACARE. DO NOT BUY OBAMACARE. Powers are not rights. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
