On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 03:19:09PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 09, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 04:46, Marco d'Itri <md@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > These are needed to support out of tree builds, > > Why isn't "make distcheck" failing then? > Did you try it with a read only source tree? Yes, be careful with "make distcheck", it does not check for all problems. Don't forget that "make distcheck" works with source code from tarball and for example gtk-doc by default add many generated files to the tarball. The best test is: git clean -xfd ./autogen.sh mkdir -p ../build cd ../build ./configure make .. and try "ls -la ../udev/libudev/docs/ | wc -l" before and after the make command :-) > > Hmm, that looks a bit too weird, doesn't it? > > > +srcdir := $(builddir) > Maybe, but without something like that the building process will create > files in the source tree. > Ubuntu uses a similar workaround, this is a known gtk-doc bug. :-( The number of non-gtk libraries is slowly growing. It would be nice to found a real solution... fix gtk-doc or found something better than gtk-doc. Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html