On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 22:06, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 21:46, Alan Jenkins > <sourcejedi.lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Udev would have avoided the race prior to >> >> 82c785e "udevd: remove check for dev_t, DEVPATH_OLD takes care of that" >> >> (the "check" removed here used to serialize events based on the device >> major:minor number). >> >> So - udev probably needs to add the check back. > > What are the two devices with the same major/minor but a different DEVPATH? To be more specific, Michael, can you please run "udevadm monitor" at the same time you see this happen? >> It might also be the case that future kernels could set DEVPATH_OLD as >> suggested. I don't know the gory details of 8250_pnp though. > > The DEVPATH_OLD is only added when one and the same device was renamed > or moved, which isn't the case here, I guess? Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
