Re: [PATCH] Use nanosleep() instead of usleep()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19.08.2009 04:17, Kay Sievers wrote:
> What's the point doing that wrapping? Will usleep() ever be removed from glibc?
Well POSIX.1-2008 removes the specification and if you disable
UCLIBC_SUSV3_LEGACY in uClibc (which is default) you will get undefined
references. I don't think it's too big of a problem to replace it for
the cases where the C library doesn't offer it, is it?

-- 
Mierswa, Daniel

If you still don't like it, that's ok: that's why I'm boss. I simply
know better than you do.
               --- Linus Torvalds, comp.os.linux.advocacy, 1996/07/22
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux