Re: [PATCH] Use nanosleep() instead of usleep()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:08, Daniel Mierswa<impulze@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> POSIX.1-2001  declares usleep() function obsolete and POSIX.1-2008
> removes it. If usleep() is no longer present on a system, we use
> nanosleep() instead.

What's the point doing that wrapping? Will usleep() ever be removed from glibc?

Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux