Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 13:20, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:39, Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > >>> Shouldn't the test be (seqnum > udev_queue->last_seen_udev_seqnum) ? >>> I.e. "greater than" instead of "less than". >>> >> Sounds like. >> > > Care to check, if that makes sense now: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commitdiff;h=8c3ae78546a535cc9288a190680fb1eb88c6ea7e > Yes, that makes sense now. Except for the comment, which seems to accurately describes the old, confused code :-) /* if we have not seen this seqnum, check if it is/was already queued */ to match the new code, I think it would be /* if we have seen this seqnum, check if it is still queued */ Ta Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
