On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:43, Soh Kam Yung <sohkamyung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>[...] >> NAME="" should suppress the device node, but still handle all other >> instructions. > > I did try NAME="", but that also didn't seem to work. > > BTW, I'm using udev-135. > > Is there a particular order in the rules that I need to be aware of > that may affect the default device node creation behaviour? > > Currently, I've tried putting the NAME="" rule in > /etc/udev/rules.d/99-ignore.rules. > > Would it help if I provided my sample rules and the debug output of udevd? Oh, I think you've found a bug in recent udev versions, since we use the new rules engine. I fixed it in the git repo: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commitdiff;h=647f7c49e8ddfbbe2afd9545484a3ad936f438e9 It will be part of udev version 138. Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
