Re: [PATCH] libudev: device - add devtype support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:19, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >> > I was playing a little bit with libudev and I actually need the DEVTYPE
>> >>> >> > from uevent for various tasks. Especially with USB and Bluetooth, the
>> >>> >> > subsystem value is too generic.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Attached is a patch that implements udev_device_get_devtype() and also
>> >>> >> > udev_device_get_parent_with_devtype(). Please double check that I did it
>> >>> >> > the right way.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Looks good. Applied.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > one minor thing that came to my mind is that DEVTYPE and subsystem are
>> >>> > actually kinda coupled. So a DEVTYPE="host" has a different semantic for
>> >>> > USB than for Bluetooth subsystem for example. Not sure if we actually
>> >>> > care or just add a udev_device_get_parent_with_subsystem_devtype()
>> >>> > function to give applications a choice if they wanna care.
>> >>>
>> >>> You mean replacing:
>> >>>   udev_device_get_parent_with_devtype(..., *devtype)
>> >>> by:
>> >>>   udev_device_get_parent_with_subsystem_devtype(..., *subsystem,  *devtype)
>> >>> ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Sounds sensible, because in most cases you don't want to check for
>> >>> parents of a different subsystem. As you are using it, want to send a
>> >>> patch?
>> >>
>> >> I am thinking of keeping both. So just adding ...subsystem_devtype() and
>> >> keeping also the original one. My reason for it is that in some case you
>> >> already know the subsystem you are looking at (or don't care in). So no
>> >> point in doing a lookup with two checks.
>> >
>> > We could make it accept NULL for the subsystem in that case?
>>
>> I guess, we should just have
>> udev_device_get_parent_with_subsystem_devtype(), and drop the both
>> other ones, and accept NULL as parameters, if you want to match only
>> one. You are right that subsystem and devtype belong together, so we
>> should probably reflect that in the API. Any problems with such
>> change?
>
> I think that make sense. So I opted for allowing devtype being NULL
> while subsystem is required. I tried to come up with a good reason why
> you would look for devtype and not subsystem and couldn't find it right
> now. The USB case is double information since they prefixed their
> devtypes with "usb_", but that is really an USB subsystem problem. For
> Bluetooth I am not doing this at all and neither does SCSI. In future no
> subsystem should.

Yeah, sounds all fine. Patches are applied.

Thanks a lot,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux