Re: default udev rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 11, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Why not split 50-udev-default.rules in 50-udev-default.rules and
> > 50-udev-permissions.rules? We continue with a default and shared
> > set of rules and a separated "permissions" file.
> It's technically not really needed, or can be easily fixed otherwise if
> needed, but if that's what people prefer, I don't really mind doing
> that.
50-udev-permissions.rules does not work because it needs ENV{ID_CLASS}
for joystick devices and ENV{ID_CDROM}, I used 91.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux