Re: default udev rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 13:06 -0300, piterpk wrote:
> > > You wrote: "The conflation of names and permissions in the default rules
> > > is a problem for us", so why shouldn't I ask for the actual things that
> > > cause problems?
> > > 
> > I did that - having group names in the rules doesn't work for us.
> > 
> > Your response was "Wrong".
> > 
> > Sorry, but this is an actual problem for me, no matter how hard you wish
> > it wasn't ;)
> 
> Why not split 50-udev-default.rules in 50-udev-default.rules and
> 50-udev-permissions.rules? We continue with a default and shared
> set of rules and a separated "permissions" file.
> 
> Isn´t that good for all?

Sure, if that makes people happy. :)

It's technically not really needed, or can be easily fixed otherwise if
needed, but if that's what people prefer, I don't really mind doing
that.

Kay

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux