Marco d'Itri (md@xxxxxxxx) said: > > So, instead of just calling setfacl() when a user logs in, it's > > better to write udev syntax and kill the daemon (oh, and then > > generate an event to apply them?) > > You do not need to kill the daemon, and if no event is received to apply > it then I suppose that there is no need to access the drive. I'm not following you here. Here's the scenario you're proposing I implement: - CD w/blank media exists, is 0640 root/disk (or whatever) - I log in - Rather than set the ACLs, the system daemon writes a udev rule - ... how does this not work without an event, and what would theoretically provide it? Bill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
