Marco d'Itri (md@xxxxxxxx) said: > On Jul 03, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I think this is intended: manually changing the permissions of dynamic > > > devices is not supposed to work. > > ....? How do you handle ACLs for local users, then? > I don't (not my package), but if I had to I would dynamically maintain > rules in /dev/.udev/rules.d/ . So, instead of just calling setfacl() when a user logs in, it's better to write udev syntax and kill the daemon (oh, and then generate an event to apply them?) That's just nuts. Far better to change all the distributed rules to only have MODE= on 'add' events, not change ones. Bill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
