On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:26:38PM +0000, Samuel Varley wrote: > I noticed that the new release does not contain the following patch. I am wondering whether this is an oversight or if you have chosen to not include it. > > mka: Revert commits that [partially] break backwards compatibility > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/hostap/patch/20210921084651.1521-1-samuel.varley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ This is still in my queue just like that patchwork entry indicates (I would have change its state and replied to the email had I actually decided not to apply it). There are couple of MACsec related changes that I have not yet had a chance to figure out the best approach for. This is one of the items that seem to have differences between the standard and the deployed implementations. There was another one as well, if I remember correctly, but it did not apparently have a pending contribution to change code, but rather an open question. Unfortunately, I do not have a good test setup for checking MACsec changes and this type of conflicts are inconvenient to resolve without clearer understanding of the implications to deployed devices. I do try to get back to this, but it could be helpful if others have views on this area as well. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
