On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:41 PM Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 20:37 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote: > > > > [ 228.315290] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: 0x00002078 | ADVANCED_SYSASSERT > > > [ 228.315294] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: 0x00A0A200 | trm_hw_status0 > > > [ 228.315297] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: 0x00000000 | trm_hw_status1 > > > [ 228.315300] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: 0x004F8E3C | branchlink2 > > > [ 228.315303] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: 0x004E4FF4 | interruptlink1 > > > [ 228.315307] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: 0x004E4FF4 | interruptlink2 > > > [ 228.315310] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: 0x07000101 | data1 > > > [ 228.315313] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: 0x48308403 | data2 > > > [ 228.315316] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: 0x00000005 | data3 > > This means that we got an invalid TX rate, notably an HE rate was > requested/configured on a MAC configuration that didn't have HE. > > I think I saw some patches in this area (configuring the MAC to be HE) > fly by internally recently, but not sure... Luca probably knows. Ah okay. This was reported on 5.4 kernel, do you think is it worth trying on latest iwlwifi-next tree? Or as you are referring to the internal tree the issue is present in the latest as well? > johannes > _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
