On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:38 PM Sugandh Huthanahally Mohan <sugandhgowda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:16 PM Sugandh Huthanahally Mohan > <sugandhgowda at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:09 PM Krishna Chaitanya > > <chaitanya.mgit at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Well, not necessarily, but hostap side it looks fine, so, > > > we need to see why the STA isn't responding well, probably a > > > different draft implementation. At the very least we should start > > > with a sniffer capture of the association b/w the stations to check > > > the IEs. > > > > I am using wpa_supplicant in STA to connect to AP. > > I am attaching hostapd logs and wpa_supplicant logs. > > I am observing that the STA is connecting and disconnecting when > > I try to connect STA to AP. > I guess this is a new STA with wpa_supplicant, right? Is it also AX200 based > chipset? In the STA mode, the kernel adds the HE IEs (either mac80211 > or the driver), > so, but interestingly in your previous dmesg, I don't see any mac80211 logs. > > So, need dmesg logs that capture the connection (look for mac80211 logs). > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:09 PM Krishna Chaitanya > > <chaitanya.mgit at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:23 AM Sugandh Huthanahally Mohan > > > <sugandhgowda at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Krishna, > > > > > > > > Currently I am not running wpa_supplicant. > > > > Is it necessary for hostapd? > > > > > > Well, not necessarily, but hostap side it looks fine, so, > > > we need to see why the STA isn't responding well, probably a > > > different draft implementation. At the very least we should start > > > with a sniffer capture of the association b/w the stations to check > > > the IEs. > > Yes this is a new STA connecting AP with wpa_supplicant. > It is also an AX200. > I don’t see mac80211 logs on the STA dmesg. > I am attaching dmesg of the station. These are from mac80211: [ 152.255545] wlp3s0: authenticate with 8c:c6:81:69:86:65 [ 152.258347] wlp3s0: send auth to 8c:c6:81:69:86:65 (try 1/3) [ 152.283971] wlp3s0: authenticated [ 152.286624] wlp3s0: associate with 8c:c6:81:69:86:65 (try 1/3) [ 152.293456] wlp3s0: RX AssocResp from 8c:c6:81:69:86:65 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=1) [ 152.299672] wlp3s0: associated [ 152.364843] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlp3s0: link becomes ready I was hoping to see some prints disabling HE, but looks fine. So, still, nothing from the logs to say why HE is disabled in the STA (why it isn't sending HE IEs in assoc resp). Only Sniffer should tell us without resorting to Whitebox debug. > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:26 PM Krishna Chaitanya > <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:16 PM Sugandh Huthanahally Mohan > > <sugandhgowda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:09 PM Krishna Chaitanya > > > <chaitanya.mgit at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, not necessarily, but hostap side it looks fine, so, > > > > we need to see why the STA isn't responding well, probably a > > > > different draft implementation. At the very least we should start > > > > with a sniffer capture of the association b/w the stations to check > > > > the IEs. > > > > > > I am using wpa_supplicant in STA to connect to AP. > > > I am attaching hostapd logs and wpa_supplicant logs. > > > I am observing that the STA is connecting and disconnecting when > > > I try to connect STA to AP. > > I guess this is a new STA with wpa_supplicant, right? Is it also AX200 based > > chipset? In the STA mode, the kernel adds the HE IEs (either mac80211 > > or the driver), > > so, but interestingly in your previous dmesg, I don't see any mac80211 logs. > > > > So, need dmesg logs that capture the connection (look for mac80211 logs). > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:09 PM Krishna Chaitanya > > > <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:23 AM Sugandh Huthanahally Mohan > > > > <sugandhgowda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Krishna, > > > > > > > > > > Currently I am not running wpa_supplicant. > > > > > Is it necessary for hostapd? > > > > > > > > Well, not necessarily, but hostap side it looks fine, so, > > > > we need to see why the STA isn't responding well, probably a > > > > different draft implementation. At the very least we should start > > > > with a sniffer capture of the association b/w the stations to check > > > > the IEs. > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Regards, > > Chaitanya T K. -- Thanks, Regards, Chaitanya T K. _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
