Re: Should EAP-TTLS only allow IETF phase 2 methods ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Your latest commits adding support for vendor specific EAP phase 2
methods for EAP-TTLS and PEAP are exactly what I needed.
Thank you.

On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 2:49 PM Jouni Malinen <j@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:45:38PM +0200, Olivier Roberdet wrote:
> > In eap_server_ttls.c, line 837, the eap_server_get_eap_method() is
> > called with the EAP_VENDOR_IETF constant passed as the vendor ID. I am
> > wondering why the vendor ID has to be this one and not the one of the
> > EAP Type that is being used. How would one use a custom EAP method for
> > phase2 ?
>
> There is no vendor specific authentication method other than a dummy one
> for testing purposes in hostap.git, so there has not been much of a need
> for such capability. Anyway, there is now support for vendor specific
> EAP methods in Phase 2 of EAP-TTLS/PEAP/FAST/TEAP in the development
> repository snapshot.
>
> --
> Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA

_______________________________________________
Hostap mailing list
Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux