On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 09:01 +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote: > On 27/08/2019 15:56, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 06:54 +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote: > >> > Shouldn't > >> > NL80211_ATTR_CONTROL_PORT_NO_ENCRYPT get set here at least in some > >> > cases? > >> > >> Well actually my goal is strictly to _disable_ encryption for this frame. > > Wait though - that means you *do* need to (always) set > > NL80211_ATTR_CONTROL_PORT_NO_ENCRYPT. > > > > Your driver might not care right now, but others will, and that might > > end up a problem if you don't set it, no? > > > > Agh! I meant to say _enable_ encryption. i.e. "disable" the bit of code that > "disables" encryption for the frame specficially. Sorry! Hmm, but why? 802.11 explicitly says EAPOL frames are _not_ to be encrypted, IIRC? johannes _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
