On 3/18/19 12:04 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
Hello, It appears that if you call 'set_neighbor' with the same data twice, then there are two duplicate entries created. Should we just reject the second set, or should we update any old values and consider the call a success? I think I'd prefer the 'update-and-succeess', but would like to hear some opinions before I write up the patch.
Actually, the code appears to already do this, so maybe I was mistaken about the double entries...I'll keep an eye on it and see if I can reproduce the problem. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
