Hi, one of Fedora wpa_supplicant package maintainers here. Updating the package to a new version typically involves finding out which build options were added and deciding which ones does it make sense to enable. Both actions require some effort: Sometimes new features don't make it into the example defconfig and when they do they typically default to disabled. I had a short look at the .config file Debian uses, and it turned out they often end up reaching a different conclusion about the options to enable than we do. That doesn't look right to me -- our user bases overlap substantially and end up interoperating in the same networks. I'm wondering whether we could align the configurations somehow, and whether upstream could help this? Would a patch set that makes upstream defconfig more inclusive in order to be useful for general-purpose OS installations as it is meet with objections? Opinions, ideas? (I'm adding more distro maintainers in Cc.) Thank you, Lubo _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
