On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Andrej Shadura <andrew.shadura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/05/18 18:53, Dan Williams wrote: >> On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 20:19 +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote: >>> From: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <mathieu.trudel-lapierre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Make it possible to list connected stations in AP mode over D-Bus, >>> along >>> with some of their properties: rx/tx packets, bytes, capabilities, >>> etc. >> >> It looks like this patch changes the signal signature of >> StaAuthorized/StaDeauthorized, is that correct? That won't be >> backwards compatible with existing D-Bus clients and we should probably >> choose new signal names to allow old clients to continue working. > > Hmm, indeed it does, and it probably shouldn’t. What would you call a > new signal with the new signature? > > Mathieu, what applications rely on the proposed new signature of this > signal? > I had written this a long while ago to use to inform GPS software, that would help triagulate using APs in range. FWIW, I won't need it at this point; feel free to rework the code to your heart's content if you can make use of it. :) -- Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <mathieu.trudel-lapierre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu.tl@xxxxxxxxx 4096R/65B58DA1 818A D123 0992 275B 23C2 CF89 C67B B4D6 65B5 8DA1 _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
